WebIt is to notice that whenever we will perform RAND () function, it always returns a different result because it is random. Therefore, this technique works effectively only with a small table. In the case of a big table, it will be slow. It is because MySQL first sorts the entire table and then return the random ones. Web2 days ago · MySQL 慢日志分析是一种分析 MySQL 数据库服务器执行慢查询的方法。通过慢日志,可以识别出哪些查询导致了性能问题,并找到解决问题的方法。 为了启用慢日志,需要在 MySQL 配置文件中设置 `slow_query_log` 和 `long_query_time` 参数。`slow_query_log` 参数控制是否启用慢 ...
Why You Should Avoid ORDER BY RAND() OR NEWID() - End Your If
WebThe pros for using this method is that it's almost instant to get the record from the database because the random value is indexed. Compare this with ORDER BY RAND () and using LIMIT offsets on larger tables which can get very slow. The cons on the other hand make this not the most suitable solution, but it does work and is quick. 1. WebSELECT * FROM tbl_name ORDER BY RAND(); To select a random sample from a set of rows, combine ORDER BY RAND() with LIMIT: SELECT * FROM table1, table2 WHERE a=b AND c pearland grocery delivery
[Solved] How to optimize slow MySQL Query due to ORDER BY …
WebSo: SELECT * FROM mytable ORDER BY RAND () LIMIT 1 I ran this query a number of times as well, and it took around 33 seconds for INNODB and 30 seconds for MyISAM each time. So clearly using LIMIT is much faster although it’s still not a suitable solution if random data needs to be selected frequently in an on demand application. Another alternative WebNov 18, 2007 · What happens is when you do an order by rand(), it creates a number for EVER entry. So if you have 1 million rows, the server is first creating a million random … WebJan 20, 2024 · If you have a large database and are looking to randomize a result for every single visitor to your website, this can easily slam MySQL with slow queries. This in turn causes slow performance for your end users and potentially cause high CPU load and Memory usage. WP Engine and ORDER BY 1 meadows driving